Andrew Johns; What morals, what values?

A couple of interesting reviews on the Andrew Johns Group Sex Scandal

Yes does not mean yes

But bad judgment is not the only problem with insisting only on “consent”, not morality.

Consent also means it’s every man for himself. That you can do whatever you can force some silly or intimidated woman to agree to, however much it will hurt them.

If this teenager consented to group sex, there was nothing more for Johns and his mates to know. Indeed, none seemed to think they had a duty to protect this young woman from what degraded them all. … click here to read the full story.

Does group sex make men fearless? Or are they just gay and frightened?

While it is hard to imagine my wife doing a female tag team in the hotel with the concierge, it is equally hard for me to understand why groups of men do this. Am I the only one that thinks it is totally gay? I don’t mean gay in some kind of pejorative sense, I mean gay as in homosexual. I may be behind the times but I cannot understand why any man would want to be in a room with five of his best mates in all their tumescent glory….. click here to read the full story.

One of the boys

These athletes rarely ever show remorse for the morality behind the deed. They only seem to be sorry for the subsequent embarrassment and pain it caused after they were caught. Are any of them sorry for the actual behaviours, regardless of whether they get busted or not?

When was the last time an athlete came out and said something like “my actions were disgraceful and I should not be engaging in that sort of behaviour in the first place because it is just plain wrong?”…. click here to read the full story.

[Image via The Sydney Morning Herald]

No Comment

No comments yet

Leave a reply